A critic on a Radio 4 Arts
programme when asked to give her views on Hansard, the first
play by the actor Simon Woods, started by criticising The
National Theatre. How was it that a first-time playwright and an
Old Etonian to boot, was able to stage his play with two top actors in the
large Lyttleton Theatre? After all, our great theatrical
institution is supposed to be operating a policy of diversity and Hansard,
with its cast of two middle-class white actors, is most surely aimed at white
middle-aged, middle-class Caucasians.
I took exception to this
because as far as I am aware The National, under the auspices of Rufus
Norris, has certainly not abandoned their plan to produce plays to appeal
to the whole of our society. But in so doing, wouldn’t it be wrong
for them to suddenly preclude anything that might relate to the audience this
person criticised for enjoying the play on the night she went?
Having got that little gripe
off my chest, I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed Hansard,
thanks in no small measure to the performances by Lindsay Duncan and Alex
Jennings. Their verbal jousting is timed and executed to
perfection, and what is essentially a barrage of sarcasm is turned into
brilliantly witty remarks. It is 1988 and the couple’s bickering starts
on Robin Hesketh’s return home from taking part in Any Questions the night
before. Diana, his wife of thirty years, is still in her dressing
gown in their Aga filled Oxfordshire country home and metaphorically armed and
ready for letting him know her thoughts on the programme and the fact that he
is all for Section 28, the controversial part of that year’s Local Government
Act that prohibited local authorities from ‘promoting’ homosexuality. What
doesn’t help his cause is that this suave, yes, you’ve guessed it, Old Etonian
Tory MP, has married a Labour voter. And her anger at his stance on
said Section 28 is exacerbated by her suspicion that he is having an affair.
Added to this arsenal is her scorn for her husband’s privileged background,
admiration for Maggie Thatcher and lack of any artistic temperament.
Meanwhile Robin criticises
his wife’s drinking habits, laziness and left-wing sensibilities. Does
she not remember that he has asked friends over for lunch to celebrate his
birthday? One wonders why they ever married in the first
place. Except that underneath all the scathing banter is the hint
that there was and maybe still is love between them. The problem is
that there is a gigantic elephant in the room, concerning their son, which has
affected them both so very deeply. They share their own unspoken guilt
regarding his death and it’s only once this is aired that any latent fondness
is allowed to creep back into their relationship.
Such is the depth of Duncan and Jennings’s acting
ability that they’re both able to make their seemingly unlikeable characters
eventually sympathetic. Underneath Robin’s air of superiority and
misogynistic entitlement lies a vulnerable, emotionally flawed man. Whilst
Diana, following the loss of her son, has spent too much time alone, brooding,
drinking and pouring out all her frustrations at her husband when he eventually
returns home.
The final moments of the
play when the grief they share is unlocked is devastating and in such sharp
contrast to the earlier caustic hilarity.
It’s true that there are a
few structural flaws in Hansard, but that has also been the case in
certain other productions by more experienced playwrights that have been shown
at The National. And, despite the odd criticism, Simon
Woods has penned 90 minutes worth of entertaining drama, using two
actors at the top of their game who give superb performances under the expert
direction of Simon Godwin.
No comments:
Post a Comment