I know I
shouldn’t make a comparison, but feel the need because the original production
of Christopher Hampton’s adaptation
of Choderlos de Laclos’s 1782 novel
made such an impression. Whilst this
latest offering at The Donmar is
excellent, it doesn’t exert the same menace or sexual frisson as that given off
by Alan Rickman and Lindsay Duncan in the mid eighties.
A drama of
revenge using sex as the weapon still has the power to shock. The main perpetrators are La Marquise de
Merteuil and her ex-lover, Le Vicomte de Valmont. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned was as
true then as it is now, with the Marquise instigating the whole sordid
plan. Because La Marquise was thrown to
one side by the future fiancée of the ingenue, Cecile Volanges, she aims to get
her own back by challenging Valmont to seduce the young virgin. He easily completes this task, as well as
undertaking another for his own benefit. His prime target in this instance is
Madame de Tourvel. The problem is that
he hasn’t taken into account that he might actually fall in love with the
married lady in the process. This is bad
news for him and La Marquise, who still holds a very bright torch for her
partner in crime.
Tom Scutt’s design suggests a chateau in a state of flux. The set contains the trappings of wealth but one
in desperate need of a make-over. The
walls are scuffed and have paintings leaning against them rather than
hung. It suggests impermanence; what was,
is, or soon will be …. gone. This is
affecting. What is not is the covering
of all the furnishings by what appears to be white muslin, but turns out to be
some type of plastic. It works as a
covering for the sleeping Cecile but is very disconcerting when the actors have
to wade through it.
In my
opinion, the evening belongs to Janet
McTeer as the controlling Marquise.
Statuesque and languidly elegant in pale grey satin, her flashing eyes prove
a window into her soul. They reflect her
initial scheming and final loss, when we realise that this manipulative,
supposedly strong woman, is actually truly vulnerable.
Dominic West isn’t (or certainly wasn’t when I saw the play)
quite so at ease in his role as Valmont, at least until he succumbs to love in
the Second Act. Whether this is due to
him being unsure of his lines, or miscast, I’m not sure, but I hope this excellent
actor becomes more sexually predatory as the run progresses. Maybe it’s the spectre of the sinuous Alan Rickman that’s the problem. I hope so as Mr. West is undoubtedly one of our great actors who is more than
capable of highlighting his steamy side (as shown in the US TV show The
Affair).
Elaine Cassidy is an incredibly brittle Madame de Tourvel, but
perfectly portrays the terror she feels at eventually surrendering to her
sexual desires. Her melt down in
Valmont’s arms is alarming to watch. I
can’t help but wonder how Michelle
Docherty would have fared in the role.
No comments:
Post a Comment